Site 1:
- narrow, 8-10m
- possibility of access from both front and rear
- close proximity to car park and park - public spaces (works well with the free flow of people idea)
- sufficient solar access for external courtyard at rear
- linear scheme
Site 2:
- 3 different sides facing street - free flow of people
- more removed from King Street, especially south side (better courtyard)
- too many sides to address
- non-linear configuration
- expansive - 600m^2 vs. 400m^2 (site 1)
Site 3:
- too close to busy road/intersection
- too restricted, bounded on all sides by buildings
- limited solar access
- angled front difficult to work with
Conclusion: tossing up between sites 1 and 2.
No comments:
Post a Comment